Okay, the basic idea here is an extension of the whole "terms of use" thing surrounding software, movies, music, etc. to fast food. In the first panel, Tatanya and her friends are eating at a food court or something, and Xcilla offers the others her leftover fries. They accept, but a lawyer for a made-up fast food RIAA-analogue suddenly appears in the second panel, and tells them that sharing food is a violation of the terms of use of that food, mcdonalds loses some ridiculously inflated sum of money due to fry sharing, they need to buy two new sets of french fries, or they'll be sued, etc. Then, in the third panel, something else happens. This is where you all come in. What I have now is chappy chappy swinging down on a vine or something, and striking pain into the head of the lawyer fellow with a club, or rather, a bat. Tatanya would have said something about her "crack legal team" in the second panel, in response to the lawyer fellow, which would refer to the sound chappy's bat makes when it "cracks" the appropriate skull. She then declares herself above the law, you can see it in the scan above. Now, I'm quite fond of the "ha ha, violence!" theory of strip-ending, but I don't think it's appropriate here. I want this strip to be funny to readers who aren't familiar with the strip or characters. Let me know how you think it should end by clicking anywhere on this sentence.